Newly discovered view of brain blood flow during surgery could prevent debilitation, save lives

Tracking the brain’s blood flow during neurosurgery represents one of the most critical and challenging parts of the operation. A brief interruption can mean the difference between permanent damage and full recovery, but it’s difficult to track blood flow across the surgical field.

Now, researchers at The University of Texas at Austin have developed a new way to monitor blood flow with standard camera hardware. The method, called sinusoidal intensity modulation speckle imaging (SIMSI), uses the physics of dynamic light scattering to image blood flow noninvasively, across a wide field of view and without high-speed cameras. The paper is published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

A new approach to tracking blood flow

“This has been a fundamental challenge in the field for a long time,” said Andrew Dunn, a professor in the Cockrell School of Engineering’s Department of Biomedical Engineering, whose lab published the finding. “SIMSI gives us a way to get quantitative, physically meaningful numbers from a technique that is already fast and practical enough to use in the clinic.”

In addition to neurosurgery, this technology could improve monitoring during cardiac surgery, help assess tissue viability in reconstructive procedures, guide treatment decisions in stroke care, and support research into conditions ranging from dementia to traumatic brain injury.

Building on earlier speckle imaging work
This research builds on a technique called laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI), which has been widely used in biomedical research to image blood flow. When laser light illuminates tissue, the movement of red blood cells causes the resulting laser speckle pattern, a granular, shimmering image, to blur in proportion to how fast the cells are moving. By analyzing that blur, researchers can map blood flow across an entire field of view simultaneously, without touching the tissue or injecting dyes.

However, conventional LSCI provides only relative measurements. It can tell that flow increased or decreased, but not by exactly how much, or what the absolute blood flow is.

How SIMSI makes flow quantitative

SIMSI solves this problem by adding precise modulation to the laser illumination, varying light intensity in a sinusoidal pattern at a controlled frequency within each camera exposure. This seemingly simple addition, combined with a new imaging model, encodes information about fast blood flow dynamics into the speckle images, allowing researchers to make more quantitative, physically meaningful measurements without relying on high-speed cameras.

The result is a camera-based system that produces quantitative maps of rapid blood flow dynamics across a wide field of view without contacting the tissue.

Capturing fast dynamics with standard cameras

“Blood flow can change over many timescales, but the optical fluctuations that reveal how fast blood is moving are often too fast for standard cameras to sample directly,” said Hengfa Lu, a postdoctoral fellow in Dunn’s Functional Optical Imaging Laboratory who led the development of the SIMSI framework.

“By intentionally modulating the illumination during the exposure and using a newly derived imaging model, we can recover fast blood flow dynamics that would otherwise be averaged out. That gives researchers a more quantitative way to study how tissue is functioning, from stroke recovery in the lab to, eventually, surgical decision-making.”

From early research to clinical translation

Dunn has been working on this research for 25 years, dating back to documenting the first use of laser speckle to image brain blood flow in 2001. He translated this technology to the operating room for the first time in 2010. In 2024, Dunn worked with UT’s Discovery to Impact commercialization hub to license his SpeckleView surgical imaging platform to Austin-based medical device startup Dynamic Light.

Looking ahead, the team sees SIMSI as part of a broader effort to make fast, quantitative blood flow imaging more accessible. By pairing engineered illumination with a physics-based imaging model, the approach enables standard cameras to capture rapid dynamics while maintaining long, light-efficient exposures. That could open new opportunities in stroke research, brain injury, surgery and other areas where blood flow is an early signal of tissue health.

AI-designed universal vaccine clears first human trial, targets future coronavirus threats with needle-free delivery

The first human clinical trial of a universal Sarbeco coronavirus vaccine, developed by the University of Cambridge and spin-out DIOSynVax (DVX) Ltd, has shown that the vaccine is safe and has no significant side effects.

The trial, involving 39 healthy volunteers, tested a vaccine designed to provide protection against multiple Sarbeco coronaviruses—the large group of viruses that occur in nature including SARS-CoV-2, which caused the COVID pandemic.

The vaccine triggered immune responses in the volunteers not only to SARS-CoV-2 and SARS, but to related bat viruses that could potentially jump from animals to humans and cause future pandemics.

This trial proves the safety of an entirely new way of designing vaccines. The technology uses an AI-designed “super antigen” to provide lasting protection against a broad range of viruses—for example the Ebola group, or Sarbeco coronavirus group—even as they mutate.

Vaccines developed in this way could protect against future emerging virus threats. The technology also reduces the need for frequent reformulation, which is a fundamental limitation of current vaccines.

This is the first time that a vaccine whose active component was designed entirely by computer simulations has been tested in humans.

Participants took part in the trials at National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Facilities in Southampton and Cambridge.

The results are published in the Journal of Infection.

“We’ve converted vaccine development from being reactive to being future proof. Our vaccines will continue to provide protection against viruses even as they mutate into new strains,” said Professor Jonathan Heeney from the Lab of Viral Zoonotics, University of Cambridge’s Department of Veterinary Medicine, the scientific lead of the research.

“We’ve overcome the problem of traditional vaccines, which have limited protection. It means we can escape the constant cycle of chasing the virus variants circulating in humans and updating the vaccines to try to catch up, like a dog chasing its tail.”

The antigen is the active ingredient in a vaccine—it triggers the body’s immune system to produce a protective immune response, training it to fight off future infection by a broad array of pathogens containing these specific DVX antigens.

Current vaccines, such as the seasonal flu vaccine and existing COVID-19 vaccines, use antigens from specific virus strains or variants that have already been detected in humans. But since viruses are constantly mutating, by the time these traditional vaccines are manufactured and distributed, they have limited protection and must be updated annually in an effort to keep up.

To design the antigen for a universal coronavirus vaccine, the team used all the available genetic sequence data for Sarbeco coronaviruses logged by surveillance programs around the world. Using machine learning, they then designed a super antigen containing the antigen features common to this whole group of viruses—including ones that haven’t emerged yet.

Human clinical trials

The vaccine was given to volunteers between 18 and 50 years old at the NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility at UHSFT, and at the NIHR Cambridge Clinical research Facility at Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge.

The super antigen is compatible with most vaccine delivery systems. In this trial, it was administered as a DNA vaccine through a micro fluid jet. This needle-free delivery method offers an alternative to those with a fear of needle-based injections. This could make vaccination faster and easier to carry out in large numbers of people, especially in settings where conventional injections are more challenging to deliver.

A previous trial in animals—an important step before beginning human clinical trials—found that the vaccine provided a strong immune response against a range of coronaviruses.

Further development of the vaccine is needed before it is ready for public use. A larger Phase II trial will next assess the vaccine’s ability to induce immune responses in a wider and more diverse population, and confirm that it generates strong, broadly protective immune responses.

The continuous pandemic threat

“Viruses like influenza, coronavirus and the Ebola group are evolving continuously and by the time vaccines are rolled out, they may be poorly matched—the current ‘reactive’ vaccine system struggles to keep pace,” said Professor Saul Faust from the University of Southampton, the trial’s chief investigator.

“This new class of universal vaccines is future-proofed. They not only protect against many variants simultaneously, but potentially against related viruses that haven’t yet emerged and spilled over to humans.

“If we can develop and clinically advance this new class of vaccines before a virus outbreak begins, millions of lives could be saved, lockdowns avoided and the economy preserved.”

Professor Marian Knight, Scientific Director for NIHR Infrastructure, said, “The remarkable success of this AI-designed ‘super-antigen’ trial marks a pivotal leap forward in our ability to deliver broad, lasting viral protection.”

She added, “This milestone was only made possible through partnerships between the life sciences sector and our world-class NIHR infrastructure in Cambridge and Southampton, whose Clinical Research Facilities provided the vital expertise and environment needed to safely fast-track this innovation, and bring it one big step closer to patients.”

Coronaviruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and related Sarbeco coronaviruses continue to pose a threat to public health. A wide range of these and other viruses continue to circulate in animals that could potentially jump to humans at any time—but it’s not possible to predict which one, or when.

Autism may have two distinct subtypes based on brain connectivity patterns

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD), commonly referred to as autism, is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by differences in social interactions, communication, behavior and the processing of sensory stimuli. Notably, the experiences, aptitudes and needs of autistic people can vary significantly.

Some neuroscientists have been exploring the possibility that this well-documented diversity partly reflects differences in the brain’s organization and underlying neurobiology. However, so far only a few studies have been able to link differences in autistic behavior to specific neurobiological processes.

Researchers at the Italian Institute of Technology’s Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems (CNCS@UNITN) and the Child Mind Institute in New York carried out a study aimed at better delineating the brain connectivity patterns associated with autism.

Their findings, published in Nature Neuroscience, led to the identification of two distinct autism subtypes characterized by distinct connectivity patterns.

“This study was inspired by a certain frustration with how neuroimaging findings in autism have often been interpreted,” Alessandro Gozzi, senior author of the paper, told Medical Xpress.

“Autism is extremely heterogeneous clinically, and for many years imaging studies have also reported heterogeneous and sometimes apparently conflicting findings: some studies found reduced functional connectivity, others found increased connectivity, and others found more complex patterns.

“This led to a long debate about what this variability means. In many cases, it was treated as noise, a manifestation of the reproducibility crisis in neuroscience, or as a problem to be averaged away.”

In collaboration with Adriana Di Martino and her colleagues at the Child Mind Institute, Gozzi and his team at IIT set out to test a new hypothesis. Specifically, they hypothesized that widely reported differences in the brain connectivity patterns of autistic individuals are not random “noise,” but they are instead biologically meaningful.

“In other words, we wanted to determine whether different patterns of brain connectivity in autism reflect different underlying biological mechanisms,” said Gozzi.

“To test this idea rigorously, we designed a cross-species study. We started from mouse models, because in mice we can study autism-relevant genetic and biological perturbations under controlled experimental conditions, and we can more directly interrogate causal mechanisms.”

Studying the connectivity patterns linked to autism

As part of their study, Gozzi and his colleagues studied the brain connectivity patterns associated with 20 different mouse models of autism, as well as those captured in human patients. These are mice that are genetically engineered in different ways that prompt them to exhibit behaviors like those observed in autistic people.

First, the researchers tried to determine whether the highly varied connectivity patterns that emerged across different mouse models of autism could be linked to specific molecular and cellular processes. Subsequently, they tried to determine whether the same patterns could also be observed in brain imaging data collected from autistic people.

“Our broader goal was to turn what has often been seen as a limitation of autism imaging—its variability—into a mechanistic clue,” said Gozzi. “Rather than asking whether the autistic brain is simply more connected or less connected, we asked whether there are distinct connectivity subtypes that point to different forms of underlying biology.”

To capture the connections between different brain regions in both mice and humans, the team used resting-state functional MRI (fMRI). This is an imaging technique that records brain activity that spontaneously emerges when humans and animals are awake but not engaged in any task, by tracking the flow of blood in the brain.

“In imaging neuroscience, we quantify this communication using a measure called functional connectivity,” explained Gozzi. “Put simply, if the activity of two brain regions fluctuates together over time, we infer that these regions are functionally connected.”

“Our approach had three main steps. First, we measured functional connectivity across a large panel of mouse models relevant to autism, each carrying different autism-associated genetic or biological perturbations. Second, we asked whether these models naturally grouped into distinct connectivity patterns, and whether those patterns could be linked to different molecular or cellular mechanisms.”

The final part of the team’s study was aimed at determining whether the connectivity subtypes observed in mice, or corresponding subtypes, were also present in humans. To do this, Gozzi closely collaborated with Di Martino and her colleagues at the Child Mind Institute, who collected brain scans from autistic and non-autistic children.

“The key idea was to use the mouse data as a biological “Rosetta Stone: if a given connectivity pattern in mice is associated with synaptic biology, or with immune-related mechanisms, we can then look for similar patterns in human brain scans,” said Gozzi. “In this way, the animal models helped us interpret human imaging heterogeneity in mechanistic terms, rather than only describing it statistically.”

Two different autism connectivity subtypes

The analyses carried out by Gozzi, Di Martino and their colleagues ultimately led to the identification of two different patterns in functional connectivity that were observed both in mouse models of autism and humans.

The first of these patterns was characterized by a reduced communication between brain regions (i.e., hypoconnectivity), while the other entailed an increased communication between brain regions (i.e., hyperconnectivity).

“Importantly, these patterns did not simply entail ‘more’ or ‘less’ connectivity everywhere, but organized brain-wide patterns that could be linked to distinct biology,” said Gozzi.

“This suggests that at least part of autism heterogeneity can be parsed into biologically meaningful brain-connectivity subtypes. The hypoconnected subtype was linked to synaptic pathways, suggesting altered communication between neurons.

“By contrast, the hyperconnected subtype was associated with immune-related pathways and with alterations in gene regulation, suggesting that neuroimmune mechanisms and dysregulated transcriptional programs may contribute to a different form of circuit dysfunction.”

The team’s observations could improve the neuroscientific understanding of autism. If they are validated in further studies, they could eventually also inform the development of new support tools and practices that account for differences between individual patients.

“Two individuals may both receive an autism diagnosis, and may even show overlapping behavioral features, but the brain and molecular mechanisms contributing to their condition could be quite different,” said Gozzi.

“That distinction matters if we want to move toward more precise and personalized interventions. I would emphasize that this is not yet a clinical diagnostic tool. However, it provides a framework for future precision psychiatry in autism.

“Instead of asking only whether the autistic brain is ‘more connected’ or ‘less connected,’ we can begin to ask which circuit-level subtype is present, what biology it reflects, and whether different subtypes might respond differently to interventions.”

Directions for future research

The findings of this study could soon inspire more studies exploring the functional connectivity patterns associated with ASD. Meanwhile, Gozzi and his colleagues are planning further research aimed at understanding what experiences and behavioral differences might be associated with the two connectivity subtypes that they uncovered.

“Together with Di Martino and her colleagues, we want to apply this approach to human datasets that include not only high-quality brain imaging, but also deep phenotyping: detailed information about cognition, sensory symptoms, development, adaptive functioning, clinical history, genetics, and other biological measures,” explained Gozzi.

“This will be essential to understand how these brain-based subtypes relate to the real-world diversity of autism.”

As part of their next studies, Gozzi and his colleagues also hope to delineate the features of the autism subtypes they uncovered in greater detail. While they have so far identified two subtypes, they believe that there may be additional ones.

“If we can build richer and larger mouse imaging datasets, including more models and more biological perturbations, we may be able to partition this space more finely—perhaps identifying three, four, or more mechanistically distinct subtypes,” said Gozzi. “This will take years, but it is an important direction we are already working on.”

The researchers also hope to pin-point the physiological processes associated with hyperconnectivity and hypoconnectivity. They have already come up with a few hypotheses regarding these patterns’ underlying physiology, which they are currently testing experimentally.

“We are now trying to decode these fMRI signals in terms of neuronal activity, circuit dynamics, and excitation/inhibition balance,” added Gozzi. “Ultimately, we want to go beyond demonstrating that these connectivity patterns exist, also understanding what they imply for brain function and dysfunction.”

Some tumors eliminate healthy neighboring cells to grow, study reveals

Chromosomal instability is a common feature in many solid tumors and is associated with greater aggressiveness. For years, its main contribution to cancer was thought to be driving the evolution of tumor genomes, causing cells to gain chromosomes with growth-promoting genes or lose chromosomes with tumor-suppressor genes.

A study led by Dr. Marco Milán’s laboratory at IRB Barcelona shows that chromosomal instability promotes tumor growth through a completely new mechanism. The work, published in EMBO Reports, reveals that tumor cells with an incorrect number of chromosomes can become senescent and release signals that alter the behavior of neighboring tissues.

The study, conducted in Drosophila melanogaster, shows that these senescent cells not only promote tumor growth and invasiveness but also induce the death of nearby healthy cells. This, in turn, fuels the tumor’s growth.

“What we are seeing is that the tumor doesn’t just grow due to its own internal alterations. It also interacts with the surrounding healthy tissue, preventing its cells from proliferating and ultimately killing them. And that process is necessary for the tumor to grow further,” explains Dr. Marco Milán, an ICREA researcher and head of the Development and Growth Control laboratory at IRB Barcelona.

Cells that stop dividing but remain active

When a cell has an incorrect number of chromosomes—a condition known as aneuploidy—its internal functioning becomes unbalanced. When cells can no longer properly manage the accumulated damage, they trigger alarm signals. Often, they enter senescence, a state in which they stop dividing, increase in size and release molecules that influence surrounding cells.

In principle, senescence is a protective mechanism. In specific situations, such as an injury, senescent cells help attract the immune system to repair tissue. The problem arises when these cells are not cleared and persist in the body chronically. When that happens, their sustained activity can generate inflammation and promote pathological processes such as aging or cancer.

In this work, the team studied senescent cells caused by aneuploidy—that is, cells with an abnormal number of chromosomes. Although these cells present highly diverse alterations, the researchers observed that they share a common response. This shared program includes halting cell division, activating stress response mechanisms and an increased capacity to secrete signals into their environment.

The research was carried out in Drosophila melanogaster, a model that allows scientists to observe in a living organism how cells with chromosomal instability interact with surrounding tissues. Many of the behaviors described here, such as aneuploidy, senescence and the secretion of inflammatory signals, have also been observed in mammalian cells.

A tumor that modifies its environment

Milán’s laboratory has spent more than a decade studying how chromosomal instability contributes to tumor development. Previous work by the group had identified signals secreted by senescent cells that promote tumor growth, invasion and systemic effects on the body.

In this new study, the team describes a fourth function of these cells: their ability to damage neighboring healthy tissue. The researchers identified several molecules secreted by senescent cells that act on nearby normal cells. Some of these molecules, such as Dilp8 (relaxin in humans) and ImpL2 (IGFBP7 in humans), reduce the proliferation of neighboring cells. Others, such as the cytokines Upd1 and Upd3 (IL-6 in humans) and Eiger (a molecule equivalent to TNF in mammals), help induce the death of these nearby healthy cells.

“We know that the tumor needs these neighboring cells to die in order to grow more. What we don’t yet know for sure is why. One possibility is that the death of these cells releases nutrients, such as amino acids or other metabolites, which the tumor can then exploit,” explains Kaustuv Ghosh, co-first author of the study alongside Aishwarya Kunchur.

Moving forward, the team wants to study the heterogeneity of these aneuploid senescent cells with greater resolution.

To do this, “we plan to use single-cell analysis to see if the gain or loss of specific chromosomes is associated with specific behaviors within the tumor,” Dr. Milán says.

Fasting after 60 changes more than waistlines, exposing a trade-off many dieters never see coming

Most folks know intermittent fasting helps with weight loss, usually by limiting your daily eating window or cutting calories a couple of times a week. But does your age change how well this works for you—and might there be some hidden dangers?

Intermittent fasting, such as time-restricted eating or the 5:2 diet, is very popular. With this eating method, you will consume your food within an eight-hour period and fast the rest. With the 5:2 diet, you eat normally five days of the week and drastically cut your calories on the other two days. Many studies show that these techniques are effective, but whether the effectiveness is distributed equally across the population, and especially among people of different ages, is unknown.

A recent comprehensive analysis of 28 clinical trials involving over 1,800 adults shows that intermittent fasting (IF) cuts down body weight and BMI, irrespective of age and sex. However, this deep dive into the data uncovers a surprising truth: the metabolic journey on IF is far from uniform.

A 20-something experiences a distinctly different set of physiological adaptations from those of a 60-year-old. This age-dependent response challenges the traditional one-size-fits-all approach to fasting, revealing that while weight loss is universal, the underlying health impacts are profoundly influenced by where you are in life.

When fat loss comes at the price of muscle

Health isn’t just about the number on the scale. Alarmingly, the study, published in the journal Nutrients, found that in many groups a large share of pounds lost was lean mass, not just fat.

In fact, weight loss often carries a known penalty: typically, 20–30% of the dropped weight is muscle. One fasting trial reported 65% of the weight loss came from lean tissue. Without careful planning, those who fast can end up thinner and weaker. That might be especially dangerous for older adults, who naturally lose muscle each year.

It is essential to prevent muscle loss. Increasing research indicates that strength training and a higher intake of protein can replace the fasting lean-mass drains. For instance, scientists found that exercise paired with a time-restricted eating plan preserved muscle: fasters who also did aerobic or resistance workouts lost fat but preserved their lean tissue.

A study of alternate-day fasting in conjunction with exercise resulted in a loss of 6 kg of body weight (5 kg fat, 0 kg muscle) and even dropped LDL cholesterol by 12%. The takeaway: fast with weights. Experts now recommend that anyone on an IF diet should boost protein intake and do resistance training to help the muscles hang on during the calorie cuts.

A surprise: Rising LDL

Even as many health markers improve on IF, one finding raised eyebrows: bad cholesterol rose on average, across age groups. Prior analyses had reported that intermittent fasting typically lowers LDL cholesterol, yet this review saw just the opposite.

After fasting, participants’ LDL-C tended to creep up in most age brackets. This was enough to set off alarm bells. As one of the authors warns, “the generalized risk of LDL-C elevation across age strata dictates a mandate for vigilant lipid monitoring.” Therefore, even if your blood sugar and triglycerides improve, regular cholesterol tests are crucial for those on fasting diets to ensure heart health.

Fasting with safeguards: protein, weights and checks

It should be noted that this is not a general condemnation of fasting. According to the authors, IF is “an effective weight-management tool,” not a cure for all. It’s all about customizing. This involves, in practice, fasting and muscle-friendly activities. Fueling up on lots of high-quality protein combined with gym activity—especially as we age—can help preserve strength.

Harvard experts, for example, found that exercise added to a feeding-window diet prevented muscle loss found in fasters without exercise. Meanwhile, check your lipids: getting screened for cholesterol is a good idea while fasting if you make it a habit.

What’s the conclusion? Indeed, intermittent fasting will help lose weight for the young and old. Age plays a role in side effects. According to one of the study’s authors, “IF is an effective weight-management tool but elicits distinct, age-specific metabolic trajectories.”

In your 20s, then, fasting is metabolically different from fasting in your 60s. In the future, research will determine ways to preserve muscle and manage LDL spikes. Until that time, eat smart: treat interventional fasting like a tool in a toolbox of healthy habits, not a cure-all.

New AI tools could help eye doctors diagnose retinal disease faster

Non-invasive eye scans allow doctors a zoomed-in, three-dimensional look beneath the eye’s surface without causing discomfort or pain to the patient. Used routinely in clinics worldwide, the scans produce detailed views of individual layers of the eye’s interior to help diagnose conditions that threaten vision. But with that level of precision comes a flood of data—hundreds of images per scan that physicians have to review manually, a time-consuming process that is vulnerable to human error.

Now, researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, in collaboration with colleagues at the University of Washington in Seattle and Genentech, Inc., have developed an experimental artificial intelligence (AI) system that can speed the scan review process and help doctors spot subtle signs of eye disease sooner. The technology, called OCTCube-M, includes a family of three AI models that are designed to read and interpret 3D images of the eye’s retina as well as other types of eye scans.

In a new study, the researchers found that, compared with older models, the new AI system more accurately identified eight different retinal diseases, including age-related macular degeneration, a common disease that damages the retina and is the leading cause of blindness in people over 50. It also was more accurate in its predictions of how fast a severe form of this condition, called geographic atrophy, would progress.

The findings describing the technology in its research stage were published recently in Nature Biomedical Engineering.

“Today’s eye scans provide physicians an unprecedented, highly detailed view of the inside of the eye, revealing structures and subtle changes that would otherwise go undetected,” said the study’s co-corresponding author Aaron Lee, MD, the Arthur W. Stickle Distinguished Professor of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and head of the John F. Hardesty, MD Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences at WashU Medicine.

“But we still lack the tools to help physicians process the volume of generated images. Our AI system has the potential to empower physicians to make faster diagnoses, tailor treatment more precisely and design clinical trials that bring new therapies to patients faster.”

Additionally, the study showed that the model could infer health risks beyond the eye, predicting outcomes such as heart attack, stroke and kidney failure based solely on retinal imaging. The tiny blood vessels in the retina are anatomically and developmentally the same as those in the kidney, and the processes that lead to plaque buildup inside the walls of blood vessels that feed the heart and brain also leave signatures in the eye.

“The model has the potential to turn a simple eye exam into a powerful tool for helping to detect illness beyond the eye,” said Lee. “It opens the door to earlier detection, more precise monitoring and potentially better outcomes for patients who might otherwise go undiagnosed until their disease is far more advanced.”

A diagnosis needle in a haystack of data

At least 2.2 billion people worldwide have vision impairment, according to the World Health Organization. The imaging method known as optical coherence tomography has transformed the diagnosis and care of conditions that cause vision loss by generating, via a single and swift scan, hundreds of cross-sectional images that together form a detailed, 3D picture of the retina and the optic nerve. It can reveal early signs of different eye diseases such as glaucoma, macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy, among other conditions.

AI, meanwhile, has become a powerful tool for processing large medical datasets, and Lee and colleagues have made notable contributions to the field. Several years ago, they published, in Nature, results describing a model that is better at diagnosing eye disease in two-dimensional retinal images compared to older models.

Because the model was trained on 2D tomography images, the researchers sought to determine if adding 3D tomography images could further improve disease diagnosis and prognosis. Because disease often extends in all three dimensions around the fovea, a small pit in the center of the retina responsible for the sharp, detailed vision required to read text and recognize faces, they hypothesized that training models on 3D images would provide more complete and accurate views of the tissue. To that end, more than 26,000 3D optical coherence tomography images comprising 1.62 million individual retinal slices—cross-sectional images of the retina—were used to train OCTCube-M.

When compared to the model trained on 2D images, OCTCube-M more accurately identified six of the eight retinal diseases by about four to six percentage points. That translates to the tool finding 43 to 60 additional cases out of every 1,000 individuals with eye disease. This was true across scans taken from individuals at multiple clinical sites, imaging modalities and diverse patient populations.

The eight diseases identified by the model include serious conditions that primarily affect the back of the eye, including the retina and optic nerve. Together they are the leading causes of vision loss and are linked to other conditions such as diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular disease.

The researchers, including Cecilia S. Lee, MD, the Jane Hardesty Poole Distinguished Professor in ophthalmology and visual sciences at WashU Medicine; Sheng Wang, Ph.D., an assistant professor in the Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering at the University of Washington; and Miao Zhang, Ph.D., a senior AI scientist at San Francisco-based biotech company Genentech, then adapted the 3D model by adding data from two other eye imaging techniques—infrared retinal imaging and fundus autofluorescence imaging.

By combining optical coherence tomography with one or both of the other imaging types, the AI models can construct a more complete view of the eye and a deeper understanding of what’s happening inside, Aaron Lee explained. Indeed, the model trained on all three imaging types excelled at predicting the growth rate of the severe form of macular degeneration, geographic atrophy, significantly outperforming the current state-of-the art model that trains only on fundus autofluorescence images of the retina by an average of nearly 50%.

Geographic atrophy affects about 5 million people worldwide, and there are few effective treatment options. By providing information on the growth rate of the condition, Lee and colleagues’ tool could effectively detect and classify the stage of the illness, information that researchers could use to design better clinical trials of potential therapies for the disease.

“By better predicting how fast disease will worsen, we can run smaller, more efficient studies,” Lee said. “That could lower costs, shorten the time it takes to test new therapies, reduce the number of people exposed to treatments that don’t work and help effective drugs reach patients sooner.”

Next, the WashU Medicine researchers will train OCTCube-M with larger datasets encompassing more patients, more diseases and even more types of imaging data to continue improving upon it.

Breakthrough Clinical Milestones Drive Record Biotech Investment Returns Across Global Markets

The biotech investment landscape has undergone a dramatic transformation, with clinical milestone achievements becoming the primary catalyst driving unprecedented capital flows into biotechnology companies worldwide. As pharmaceutical giants and venture capital funds pour billions into companies demonstrating measurable progress through clinical trials, the strategic importance of milestone-driven investment decisions has reached new heights.

Recent market data reveals that biotech companies achieving significant clinical milestones have attracted 340% more investment capital compared to pre-clinical stage ventures. This shift represents a fundamental change in how global investors evaluate biotechnology opportunities, moving away from speculative early-stage betting toward evidence-based milestone tracking.

Clinical Trial Progression Attracts Institutional Investment

Institutional investors have fundamentally shifted their biotech allocation strategies, with clinical milestone achievement serving as the primary screening criterion for major capital deployment. Leading pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and insurance companies now require clear evidence of clinical progress before committing substantial resources to biotechnology ventures.

The numbers speak volumes about this transformation. Companies progressing from Phase I to Phase II trials have seen average funding rounds increase by 280%, while those advancing to Phase III trials command valuations often exceeding $2 billion. This milestone-driven approach has created a more structured and predictable investment environment, reducing the traditional volatility associated with biotech speculation.

Major pharmaceutical companies are also leveraging clinical milestone data to guide their acquisition strategies. Rather than acquiring early-stage assets with uncertain outcomes, Big Pharma is increasingly targeting companies with proven clinical milestone achievements, often paying premium prices for de-risked assets that demonstrate clear therapeutic potential.

Global Regulatory Alignment Amplifies Milestone Value

The increasing harmonization of global regulatory frameworks has amplified the value of each clinical milestone achievement across multiple markets simultaneously. When biotech companies reach significant clinical benchmarks, they often unlock market opportunities spanning North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific regions concurrently.

This regulatory alignment has created a multiplier effect for clinical milestone value. A successful Phase III trial completion in one major market now typically translates to accelerated approval pathways in other jurisdictions, dramatically expanding the commercial potential of each milestone achievement. Investors recognize this expanded reach and adjust their valuations accordingly.

The FDA’s breakthrough therapy designation program, combined with similar fast-track initiatives from the European Medicines Agency and other global regulators, has further elevated the importance of clinical milestone timing. Companies that strategically plan their clinical milestone achievements to align with regulatory priorities often secure preferential review processes and accelerated market access.

Technology Platforms Accelerate Milestone Achievement

Advanced technology platforms are revolutionizing how biotech companies approach and achieve clinical milestones, creating new investment opportunities centered on milestone acceleration capabilities. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and sophisticated data analytics platforms are enabling companies to reach clinical milestone targets faster and with higher success probabilities.

Companies utilizing AI-driven drug discovery platforms are reaching their first clinical milestone achievements 18 months faster than traditional approaches, according to recent industry analysis. This acceleration has attracted significant investment from technology-focused venture capital firms seeking to capitalize on the intersection of biotechnology and artificial intelligence.

Platform companies that demonstrate consistent clinical milestone achievement across multiple therapeutic programs are commanding particularly high valuations. These businesses offer investors diversified exposure to clinical milestone success while reducing single-asset risk through portfolio approaches to drug development.

Emerging Markets Embrace Milestone-Driven Investment

Emerging market economies are increasingly adopting milestone-driven biotech investment strategies, creating new global opportunities for companies achieving significant clinical progress. Countries including India, Brazil, and several Southeast Asian nations have established milestone-based funding programs designed to attract international biotech investment.

These emerging market initiatives often provide substantial financial incentives for companies that achieve specific clinical milestone targets within their jurisdictions. The combination of lower operational costs and government milestone incentives is attracting biotech companies to establish clinical operations in these regions, creating new investment opportunities for local and international capital.

The globalization of clinical milestone investment strategies has also led to increased cross-border partnerships and licensing agreements. Biotech companies are leveraging their clinical milestone achievements to secure development partnerships across multiple regions, maximizing the commercial value of each milestone accomplishment.

The convergence of regulatory harmonization, technological advancement, and global capital mobility has positioned clinical milestone achievement as the cornerstone of modern biotech investment strategy. As companies continue demonstrating measurable clinical progress, investors worldwide are recognizing that milestone-driven approaches offer the optimal balance of risk management and return potential in an increasingly competitive biotechnology landscape.

Smartphone unlock can measure heart rate, potentially bringing health monitoring to billions worldwide

Wearable devices like smartwatches and fitness trackers have revolutionized the way we monitor our health. Worn around the clock, these devices quietly collect valuable data—from heart rate and blood oxygen levels to sleep quality—giving users a real-time window into their well-being without disrupting their daily lives.

A recent study has found a way to track heart rate without requiring people to wear anything at all. Instead, all they need is for someone to use their smartphone, which is quite convenient, since the average person already spends upwards of five hours a day on their phone.

This technology, supported by deep learning, captures an eight-second video using the front camera every time a user unlocks their phone. The video information is then used to passively monitor heart rate from a distance by detecting subtle changes in skin color caused by blood flow. To ensure participants’ privacy was not compromised, videos remained on their devices until they were manually reviewed and approved for upload.

According to findings published in Nature, the system not only met industry accuracy standards, keeping heart-rate measurement errors below 10%, but also maintained its accuracy across all skin tones—a win, given that many existing technologies perform poorly on darker skin tones.

Keeping a close watch on the heart

The heart does the crucial job of circulating oxygen and nutrient-rich blood throughout the body to keep all the cells able to respire and perform their specific tasks. Heart rate, especially the resting heart rate , provides a window into how the heart is functioning, as well as our overall health and energy levels. Measuring resting heart rate in a clinical setting requires a person to rest for prolonged periods, which makes long-term tracking difficult.

Wearables solve this by passively collecting heart rate data throughout the day, when one is resting or sleeping, to estimate RHR, thereby revealing useful changes in cardiovascular health and illness. However, such wearables are not accessible to most people; fortunately, smartphones are.

Studies show that 69% of adults globally and 90% in the US own a smartphone, with an average of 144 interactions with the device each day.

For this study, the researchers recruited 696 participants with diverse ages, sexes, and skin tones. More than 192,000 videos from 485 participants were used to train the neural network for their new passive heart-rate monitoring (PHRM) system. It measured the heart rate using a technique called remote photoplethysmography (rPPG).

With every heartbeat, a surge of blood passes through the vessels in the face, slightly altering the amount of light reflected by the skin. These changes, though invisible to the naked eye, can be captured on a smartphone’s camera, allowing the system to measure a person’s heart rate.

After the system was up and running, a separate group of 211 participants was used to validate its performance in both laboratory and real-world environments.

The data indicated that a smartphone can accurately measure heart rate under different lighting conditions. The team tested PHRM against reference electrocardiograms and found heart rate measurements fell within 10% error across all skin tones and met industry accuracy standards.

By stitching together several short measurements across the day, the system estimated daily resting heart rate nearly as accurately as a professional-grade wearable strap.

Once privacy concerns are addressed and the technology is validated in larger populations, a system like PHRM has the potential to put heart-health monitoring in the hands of billions, including communities lacking access to traditional health care systems. The ability of smartphones to measure heart rate also leaves us with the question of what other health signals could we monitor using our phones?

Written for you by our author Sanjukta Mondal, ed

Prenatal Zika exposure may trigger vision, hearing and social changes despite seemingly healthy births

Infants exposed to the Zika virus during pregnancy may face hidden developmental challenges, even if they appear healthy at birth. A recent study at the University of Wisconsin-Madison highlights the need for better developmental screening during a child’s first year of life.

Zika virus is known to cause severe birth defects—such as brain damage and microcephaly, a much smaller head and brain. However, little is understood about why 30% of babies born without physical symptoms go on to experience developmental problems including vision and hearing loss.

To better understand what happens to newborns affected by Zika infection, UW-Madison occupational therapy professor Karla Ausderau and others studied pregnant rhesus macaque monkeys at the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center. The animals were exposed to Zika virus or a placebo early in pregnancy. The scientists followed the resulting infant monkeys through one year with behavioral tests, vision and hearing assessments, and social observations.

They found that, like human babies, monkeys with prenatal virus exposure, regardless of maternal vaccination status, had increased risk of vision delays, hearing loss and changes in maternal attachment despite having no outward symptoms at birth. The researchers recently published their findings in the journal Nature Communications.

Although the infant monkeys’ eyes appeared structurally normal, researchers found disruptions in how the eyes communicated with the brain, an issue known as cortical visual dysfunction. This type of visual impairment is also seen in children who struggle with vision despite having healthy eyes. Early visual delays appeared in the monkeys as early as 3 months of age; however, those differences resolved by 12 months. The early vision changes did not predict later developmental challenges, however, and researchers say these early disruptions may signal broader effects of prenatal exposure.

“Infants exposed to Zika before birth showed altered social-emotional development and changes in cortical visual function during infancy, even when they appeared healthy at birth. And we couldn’t predict those outcomes from the mother’s infection characteristics, which is a problem if we’re trying to identify which babies need closer follow-up,” says Emma Mohr, UW-Madison pediatrics professor and co-author of the new study.

The researchers also found that hearing loss appeared more often in Zika-exposed infants than in unexposed animals, although the difference was not statistically significant.

Social behavior told another important story. Zika-exposed infants spent more time clinging to their mothers than typically expected at this age and gained more weight than the control group due to increased access to nursing. In rhesus macaques, close maternal contact normally decreases as infants grow more independent. Researchers believe this prolonged attachment may reflect difficulties with sensory processing, emotional regulation and assessing threats, skills that are critical for healthy social development.

Zika-exposed infants also showed lower inhibition by approaching new objects and situations more quickly than expected. This behavior may signal early anxiety, delayed emotional learning, or challenges in interpreting sensory information from their environment, which is risky.

The study found that maternal virus levels, placental infection and antibody responses did not predict which infants experienced developmental differences, suggesting that common maternal biomarkers are poor indicators of a child’s long-term risk. Human studies have shown that Zika infection during pregnancy can persist for months and increase the risk of miscarriage and brain abnormalities. However, those severe outcomes were not observed in this animal study—limiting conclusions about how maternal immune responses relate to the most severe cases.

The findings do point to a clear message. Prenatal Zika exposure alone can influence early development, even in the absence of visible birth defects.

“Children with prenatal Zika exposure need long-term neurodevelopmental follow-up, not just a clean bill of health at birth. The subtle differences we’re detecting wouldn’t be picked up on a routine exam, but they’re the kinds of things that can shape learning, behavior and social development as kids grow,” Mohr says.

The study strengthens the case for routine developmental monitoring of all children exposed to Zika during pregnancy, regardless of symptoms at birth, according to the authors. Early detection could allow for timely interventions when delays emerge. They also stress that prevention remains the strongest defense.

“Vaccines and mosquito control are still the best tools we have,” says Mohr. “Once infection occurs, the damage may already be done.”

Breaking Through Barriers: How Clinical Milestones Are Reshaping Biotech Investment Strategies

The biotech industry stands at a transformative juncture, where each clinical milestone achieved reverberates through global markets, influencing investment decisions and reshaping entire therapeutic landscapes. These pivotal moments in drug development represent far more than scientific achievements—they serve as critical inflection points that can determine the fate of companies, affect patient access to life-saving treatments, and drive billions in investment capital.

Understanding the intricate relationship between clinical progress and market dynamics has become essential for investors, industry stakeholders, and healthcare professionals navigating an increasingly complex biotechnology ecosystem. The ability to identify and interpret these breakthrough moments often separates successful investment strategies from costly miscalculations.

The Anatomy of Market-Moving Clinical Achievements

A clinical milestone encompasses various stages of drug development, from initial safety studies to pivotal Phase III trials and regulatory approvals. Each phase carries distinct risk profiles and potential rewards, creating a complex web of investment considerations. When companies announce positive results from clinical trials, particularly in areas of high unmet medical need, the market response can be immediate and dramatic.

Recent data indicates that successful Phase III trial announcements in oncology and rare diseases have generated average stock price increases of 40-60% within trading sessions. This volatility reflects the high-stakes nature of biotech investments, where a single clinical milestone can validate years of research and billions in development costs. Conversely, failed trials can result in equally dramatic downturns, emphasizing the critical importance of rigorous clinical execution.

The global nature of clinical development means that regulatory milestones in major markets—including FDA approvals, EMA authorizations, and emerging market clearances—create cascading effects across international investment portfolios. Sophisticated investors now track clinical timelines across multiple jurisdictions, recognizing that each approval represents incremental value creation and market expansion opportunities.

Investment Capital Flows Following Breakthrough Results

The relationship between clinical milestone achievements and investment flows has evolved significantly, with institutional investors developing increasingly sophisticated methodologies for evaluating biotech opportunities. Venture capital firms, private equity groups, and public market investors now employ specialized teams focused exclusively on clinical data interpretation and regulatory pathway analysis.

Data from leading investment tracking platforms reveals that biotech companies announcing positive clinical milestone results experience an average 3x increase in institutional interest within 90 days of the announcement. This surge in attention translates into enhanced funding opportunities, strategic partnerships, and acquisition interest from larger pharmaceutical companies seeking to expand their pipelines.

The emergence of specialized biotech investment funds has further amplified the impact of clinical achievements on market dynamics. These funds, managing hundreds of billions in assets, often take concentrated positions in companies approaching critical inflection points, creating self-reinforcing cycles of investment and valuation growth following successful clinical outcomes.

Global Regulatory Landscapes Shaping Development Strategies

Navigating the complex global regulatory environment has become a defining factor in clinical milestone planning and execution. Companies must simultaneously consider FDA requirements, EMA guidelines, and emerging market regulations while designing clinical programs that can support worldwide commercialization strategies.

The introduction of expedited regulatory pathways, including breakthrough therapy designations and accelerated approval mechanisms, has fundamentally altered the timeline and risk profile of clinical development programs. These pathways allow companies to achieve crucial regulatory milestones more rapidly, compressing traditional development timelines and creating new opportunities for investor returns.

International harmonization efforts have also influenced how companies approach clinical milestone planning. The adoption of common technical standards and data requirements across major markets enables more efficient global development programs, reducing costs and accelerating time-to-market for successful therapies.

Emerging Technologies Accelerating Clinical Progress

The integration of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and advanced analytics into clinical development processes is revolutionizing how companies approach milestone achievement. These technologies enable more precise patient selection, improved trial design, and enhanced data analysis capabilities that increase the probability of clinical success.

Digital health technologies and remote monitoring capabilities have expanded the scope and efficiency of clinical trials, enabling companies to achieve clinical milestones with greater speed and precision. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated adoption of these technologies, creating permanent changes in how clinical research is conducted and evaluated.

Biomarker-driven development strategies have become increasingly sophisticated, allowing companies to identify patient populations most likely to benefit from investigational therapies. This precision approach increases the likelihood of achieving positive clinical milestone results while reducing development costs and timelines.

The biotech industry’s evolution continues to be defined by its ability to translate scientific innovation into clinical reality, with each milestone achievement serving as a stepping stone toward improved patient outcomes and sustainable business success. As global markets become increasingly interconnected and regulatory frameworks continue evolving, the strategic importance of clinical milestone planning and execution will only intensify, making it essential for all stakeholders to understand these critical dynamics shaping the future of healthcare innovation.

error: Content is protected !!